Did you know that in 1986, president PW Botha offered to release Mandela from prison on the proviso that he..?

Q: ....renounce violence and terrorism as a means of gaining political power? Mandela refused. Dave L: Had the roles been reversed, ie, had Blacks invented guns developed their own technologies and so forth, do you for one second think that they would have been so humane, benevolent and as philanthropic as the White man is expected to be. Don't fool yourself, man! Lisa K: It looks like your continued tobacco use is making your brain all fuzzy Here's the link, the text being alonside Mandela kissing another infamous terrorist, Yasser Arafat. http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:E7uU6wHRT04J:neoconservativelincs.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html+madela+was+given+the+chance+of+renouncing+violence+never+forget+that&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3

A: Well, I'm also a fuzzy brain but will make an attempt at answering the question none the less. Botha's disgraceful "Imperial Presidency" is and was the darkest period to ever befall the fate of South Africa, prior to his lack of leadership, the country was blessed with great leaders such as Doctor Verwoerd, John Vorster and D.F. Malan who were prepared to enforce necessary doctrine. Apartheid was from its inset always going to require policies that were at times brutal in nature and that needed rigid maintenance and enforcement by hard men in order to ensure it's ultimate survival in a continuing battle against deluded liberals, Marxist ANC lies and rhetoric being spread in the west and the sheer expense to the taxpayer of having 2 million taxpayers control 40 million illiterates while fighting wars on all of it's borders. The so called "offer" and lack of clear conservative policy by Botha's presidency was interpreted by the west and liberal traitors in South Africa as being weakness and in the absence of such clear cut policy by Botha, the liberal west who had been bombarded with endless lies by the ANC, opted to use that opportunity to force their own agendas and ideals down the throat of South Africans after Botha's "Rubicon Speech" which ultimately led to De Klerk having no alternative in the 1990's but to completely dismantle Apartheid, had Botha followed the mandate given to him by South Africans and not become involved in his so called liberal "reforms", such as making offers to a vile terrorist who should have been hanged in 1964 as well as scrapping passbooks etc, Apartheid would still exist today and the country would not resemble a third world African toilet. As for Nelson Mandela, nothing more han another vile African savage Marxist terrorist.....of course he had no intention of peaceful protest and obviously, like most Africans, never understood his place on the evolutionary ladder. One should also ask the question, why did the ANC never follow the path of passive resistance as did Gandhi but rather opted to attack women and children.....the answer can be evidenced by current unrest and savagery in contemporary South Africa....they are inherently prone to violence and primitive behaviour. Let us also not forget that had the traitor De Klerk called for generl elections in 1991 the National Party would have lost power to the Conservative Party and this nightmare would have been avoided.

Related items